Deer Management Options
|
While other population control options such as fencing,
repellents, trap and transfer, fertility agents, sharp
shooting, and controlled public shotgun hunts have been studied and
restudied, bowhunting consistently proves to be the most cost efficient and effective
option for deer management in suburban areas. Fencing is expensive; repellants
require frequent applications and are less affective at high population densities. Trap
and transfer is not only labor intensive and expensive (costs average $261-567 per
deer), but also has a high mortality rate after relocation, sometimes as high as 75-80%.
Some relocated deer may also spread disease. Fertility agents are experimental,
costly, impractical (averaging $150-$500 per deer), and ineffective on the current
population size. Dosage control and ingestion of anti-fertility agents by non-target
animals and humans as well as the potential negative impacts on deer genetics are also a
concern. Sharp shooting programs are expensive and require larger contiguous
tracts of land to ensure safety. Some programs have cost taxpayers as much as $40-60,000.
Finally, public shotgun hunts are controversial, but they can be effective on larger
tracts.
|
Bowhunting is a sound management tool and has been
used for years in areas such as Quantico Marine Corps
Base, and Fort Belvoir Army Base. Bowhunting
offers a safe, low profile method of managing deer herd numbers, and is effective in small
areas close to houses, farms, and roads. Bowhunting provides an immediate population
reduction. It closely resembles, and is part of natural predation. In
Northern Virginia, natural predators such as mountain lions and wolves no longer threaten
deer. Hunting with bow and arrow is the most safe, practical, and economic method of
reducing herd size to an acceptable level.
|
Furthermore, bowhunting
opens areas to wildlife management that would otherwise be closed. In populated
areas of Northern Virginia, human habitation prevents or limits the use of firearms for
hunting overpopulated deer herds. This can result in destruction of habitat, increased
human/deer conflicts and negative effects on human life, health and property. Deer can be
removed in a selective fashion with a specific age and sex group being targeted in
overpopulated areas. Typically more does need to be removed. By targeting adult does,
maximum population reduction can be achieved quicker. This helps keep the herd to a size
compatible with the carrying capacity of the habitat and within human tolerance level.
|